Above: Job and His Alleged Friends
Job and John, Part IX: Perceptions
FEBRUARY 15, 2023
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Blessed Lord, who caused all holy scriptures to be written for our learning:
Grant us so to hear them, read, mark, learn, and inwardly digest them,
that we may embrace and ever hold fast the blessed hope of everlasting life,
which you have given us in our Savior Jesus Christ;
who lives and reigns with you and the Holy Spirit,
one God, for ever and ever. Amen.
–The Book of Common Prayer (1979), page 236
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
The Assigned Readings:
Job 11:1-20
Psalm 130 (Morning)
Psalms 32 and 139 (Evening)
John 5:19-29
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Zophar the Naamathite opens his address in Job 11:1-20 by insulting Job. A note on page 1519 of The Jewish Study Bible makes a succinct point:
Like Bildad in 8.2, Zophar here, in the house of a man bereft of his children (1.18-19) and infested with maggots (7.5), has the colassal gall to tell Job, the master of the house, that he talks too much!
And Zophar persists in the practice of relying on “received wisdom” as a basis for his theodicy.
The reading from John 5 constitutes part of a discourse attributed to Jesus after he healed the paralyzed man at the Pool at Bethesda on a Sabbath. (The Synoptic Jesus does not talk as much as does the Johannine Jesus, by the way.) The content of the discourse interest me, but the relative newness of it fascinates me today. Zophar’s discourse was stale and insulting. Yet our Lord’s discourse was revolutionary. Consider one verse, O reader:
In all truth I tell you,
whoever listens to my words,
and believes in the one who sent me,
has eternal life;
without being brought to judgement
such a person has passed from death to life.
–John 5:24, The New Jerusalem Bible
If I did not take the truth of that verse as a given, I might think Jesus to have been a madman. Now, of course, my position has become “received wisdom.” (I am aware of the irony of that reality.) Some “received wisdom” is wiser than the rest. And other “received wisdom” is pure drivel.
The power of “received wisdom” holds sway over the intellects and imaginations of people, does it not? When I started my abortive doctoral studies in history at The University of Georgia (UGA), Athens, Georgia, the Graduate Coordinator informed me that I would learn the “received wisdom.” He used that term; I recall that part of the conversation clearly. I wound up questioning much of the “received wisdom,” with the predictable result in the social sciences. But I maintained my intellectual integrity. And I am a terrible liar. Please understand me correctly, O reader; that happened years ago, and the trauma of that experience has washed out of my system. Yet memories remain. And objective reality remains. I have no desire to start an argument with anyone at the UGA Department of History. What would I gain from it? Yet I offer this cautionary tale of the allure received foolishness masquerading as received wisdom. The experience remains with me and makes me a better teacher. I hold my students accountable for getting the facts correct then reasoning their ways to interpretations. I do not grade them according to whether I agree with those interpretations. And some of the kindest comments on course evaluations begin the acknowledgement that the student disagreed with me often in subjective matters.
Reality is objective, of course. But our understandings of it are inherently subjective. Two people can absorb the same stimuli and understand it differently. Culture (defined as social learning), educational attainment, age, cognitive development, intellectual capacity, and other factors shape our perceptions. Sometimes our proverbial tapes are running, so we hear yet do not listen and see yet do not comprehend. So the character of Zophar , who was an insulting idiot, understood himself as standing on the shoulders of theological giants. And our Lord’s words were blasphemous in the ears of some people despite those words’ truth–and therefore lack of blasphemy. Reality is objective and our perceptions are subjective, yet our perceptions can be correct. May they be so, by grace.
Until the next segment of our journey….
KENNETH RANDOLPH TAYLOR
APRIL 26, 2012 COMMON ERA
THE FEAST OF SAINTS REMACLUS OF MAASTRICHT, THEODORE OF MAASTRICHT, LAMBERT OF MAASTRICHT, HUBERT OF MAASTRICHT AND LIEGE, AND FLORIBERT OF LIEGE, ROMAN CATHOLIC BISHOPS; LANDRADA OF MUNSTERBILSEN, ROMAN CATHOLIC ABBESS; AND OTGER OF UTRECHT, PLECHELM OF GUELDERLAND, AND WIRO, ROMAN CATHOLIC MISSIONARIES
THE FEAST OF CHRISTINA ROSSETTI, POET
THE FEAST OF SAINT PASCHASIUS RADBERTUS, ROMAN CATHOLIC ABBOT
THE FEAST OF ROBERT HUNT, FIRST ANGLICAN CHAPLAIN AT JAMESTOWN, VIRGINIA
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
http://blogatheologica.wordpress.com/2012/11/06/job-and-john-part-ix-perceptions/
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
ADVENT, CHRISTMAS, AND EPIPHANY DEVOTIONS 
You must be logged in to post a comment.